Natural vs. Artificial:
There are two "persons" identified
in law. These are "natural-person"
and "artificial-person". See Government Tricks for more details.
A natural-person is defined as "A human
being that has the capacity for rights and
duties". Note that the word capacity means the ability, but not the obligation for rights and duties.
An artificial-person is defined as "A
legal entity, not a human being, recognized
as a person in law to whom legal rights and
duties may attach - e.g. a body corporate".
Sometimes an artificial-person may be referred
to as a CORPORATION, which is not always
the same as an Incorporated Company. These
subtle re-definitions are made in Statutes
whenever the Government wants to change the
meaning of the word.
There are many different types of artificial-persons,
each with different duties. Here are a few
different types of artificial-persons:
Taxpayer, Resident, Driver, Voter, Citizen,
Whenever you read any Law or Statute, you
must be sure to check the meaning of the
word "person" as it applies to
that particular law.
In order to implement slavery of it's citizens
and control them according to its whim, the
Government had to invent a system that would
not violate a human-being's fundamental rights,
but would allow the Government to "own"
everything produced or gained by its citizens.
The technique used by the Government was
to create an artificial-person (referred
to herein as a CORPORATION for emphasis)
for every human-being in Canada. As creator
of a CORPORATION, the Government can demand
anything it wants from the CORPORATION. As
a legal entity, a CORPORATION does not have
feelings and cannot be hurt. It can be subject
to slavery and complete domination by its
creator and the CORPORATION must obey its
So for every John Doe human-being in Canada,
the Government created a JOHN DOE CORPORATION.
Capital letters are used to represent CORPORATIONS
and COMPANIES. Lower case letters are used
to represent the name of the natural-person.
As a CORPORATION needs a business number,
in order to do business, the Government assigns
a unique business number to each JOHN DOE
it creates. Such a business number is called
the S.I.N. (Slave Identification Number a.k.a.
Social Insurance Number). The creator (Master)
can then track all activities of the Slave
and claim ownership on all property and income
of the Slave.
Finally the Government needs to appoint an
Officer of the CORPORATION to run the day-to-day
activities. Such a position requires a contract
since the Officer will be held accountable
for the actions of the CORPORATION. So, the
Government tricks John Doe to become the
Officer for the JOHN DOE CORPORATION by signing
such contracts as Driver's Licence, Bank
Accounts, Citizenship Cards, Passports, etc.
In the Income Tax Act, the Government just decrees that John Doe
is the Legal Representative for the Officer
of the JOHN DOE CORPORATION and the only
contract involved is the annual Income Tax
Return (yes it is a contract for one year)
wherein John Doe gives his agreement as Officer
of JOHN DOE for the previous year.
Unfortunately John Doe does not know that
he is an Officer for the JOHN DOE CORPORATION
and must therefore follow the rules imposed
upon JOHN DOE. Hence the confusion sets in
because John Doe believes that he is JOHN
DOE and therefore has to forfeit his rights
and duties upon demand by the Government
and its officials.
Here is a quotation from "Memorandum on Law of the Name", which summarizes the so-called Name Game used by the courts (the All-Caps NAME is a legal-fiction: something presumed by law to be true until said presumption is rebutted and the truth is brought forward):
'It is clear that the existance of a NAME written as all-caps is a necessity-created legal-fiction. This is surely an issue to be raised, and the supporting particulares are outlined in this memorandum. Use of the proper name must be insisted upon as a matter of abatement - correction - for all parties of an action of purported law. However, the current "courts" cannot correct this since they are all based upon presumed/assumed fictional law and must use artificial, juristic NAMES. Instead, they expect the lawful Christian man or woman to accept the all-caps NAME and agree by silence to be treated as if he or she were a fictional entity invented and governed by mortal enemies. They must go to unlimited lengths to deceive and coerce this compliance or the underlying criminal farce would be exposed and a world-wide plunder/enslavement racket that has held all life on this planet in a vice grip for millenia would crumble and liberate every living thing. At this point, the would-be rulers of the world would be required to succeed in life by honest, productive labours, the way those upon whom they parasitically feed are forced to conduct their lives.'
We recently received a copy of a letter from
one of our readers (see letter) sent to the International Bar Association,
and to date, there has been no reply.
Old English Quotation:
The following are Excerpts from Chapter XVI
- Of PERSONS, AUTHORS, and things Personated from Leviathan, 1651 A.D., by Thomas Hobbes:
'A person, is he, whose words or action are
considered, either as his own, or as
the words or actions of an other man,
any other thing to whom they are attributed,
whether Truly or by Fiction.'
'When they are considered as his owne, then
is he called a Naturall Person: And when they are considered as representing
the words and action of an other, then is
he a Feigned or Artificiall person.'
'Of Persons Artificiall, some have their
words and actions Owned by those whom they represent. And then the
Person is the Actor; and he that owneth his words and actions,
is the AUTHOR.'
'And therefore he that maketh a Covenant
with the Actor, or the Representer, not knowing
the Authority he hath, doth it at his own
'An Idol, or meer Figment of the brain, may
be Personated; as were the Gods of Heathen;
which by such Officers as the State appointed,
were Personated, and held Possessions, and
other Goods, and Rights, which men from time
to time dedicated, and consecrated unto them.
But Idols cannot be Authors: for an Idol
'Of Authors there be two sorts. The first
is simply so called; which I have before
defined be him, that owneth the Action of
another simply. The second is he, that owneth
an Action, or Covenant of another conditionally;
that is to say, he undertaketh to do it,
if the other doth it not, at, or before a
certain time. And these Authors conditionall, are generally called SURETYES, in Latine
Fidejussores, and Sponsores; and particularly for Debt, Proedes; and
for Appearance before Judge, or Magistrate,
"Whereas it is essential, if man is
not to be compelled to have recourse, as
a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny
and oppression, that human rights should
be protected by the rule of law,"
(Preamble - Universal Declaration of Human Rights)